kxbcvoi
Apr 18, 08:33 AM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
I will replace iPhone 3G with white iPhone 4. I can't wait any longer.
I will replace iPhone 3G with white iPhone 4. I can't wait any longer.
ouimetnick
May 4, 01:52 PM
Why is Apple refusing to put iOS 4.3.3 on the Verizon iPhone?
DavieBoy
May 4, 01:08 PM
Any way to update and still have the phone keep tracking me everywhere. I like to stay updated but I do not want to lose that feature.
Unspoken Demise
Dec 7, 09:35 AM
This is an excellent step forward. Good work AT&T. Lets see some results from these submissions!
bigsexyy81
May 6, 11:58 AM
Battery life... feedback from anyone who has upgraded? Better or the same?
My battery on 4.2.1 was phenomenal. Ever since I upgraded to 4.3 (then 4.3.1, then 4.3.2), it has been noticeably poor. Would love to hear if this actually made any improvements in this area.
My battery on 4.2.1 was phenomenal. Ever since I upgraded to 4.3 (then 4.3.1, then 4.3.2), it has been noticeably poor. Would love to hear if this actually made any improvements in this area.
edcrosay
Aug 21, 03:18 AM
So what standard would a computer transmit to a new AE. Bonjour, nor current WiFi have the bandwidth to stream a movie over. And since you would most likely download this movie to a desktop for view within your house vs a laptop/ipod for away from home viewing, it would be plugged into an outlet. And an Airport express plugs dircetly into a wall, would it be possible to use Broadband over power lines within the home, in combo with some WiFi flavor to transmit and reconstruct the signal? Just a thought. Sorry if this has already been discussed elsewhere.
I've been streaming divx movies over 802.11b from my main windows pc to a dedicated POS 866 PIII with a video out to my TV for 4 or 5 years (This is before I learned the greatness of ... i.e. could afford a mac). I don't see how having an airport with airtunes/video would be a problem. I would buy one in a heartbeat, because it is much cheaper than buying a Mac mini for that sole purpose.
And althougth the current resolution of iTunes video is lower res than DVD, it still looks pretty good when I hook up my powerbook to my TV. It's not fantastic, but it looks better fullscreen on my 32" tube than my 24" LCD monitor. The only problem I have with it is when they crop 16x9 shows down to 4x3. I want to see Lost in all its glory.
I've been streaming divx movies over 802.11b from my main windows pc to a dedicated POS 866 PIII with a video out to my TV for 4 or 5 years (This is before I learned the greatness of ... i.e. could afford a mac). I don't see how having an airport with airtunes/video would be a problem. I would buy one in a heartbeat, because it is much cheaper than buying a Mac mini for that sole purpose.
And althougth the current resolution of iTunes video is lower res than DVD, it still looks pretty good when I hook up my powerbook to my TV. It's not fantastic, but it looks better fullscreen on my 32" tube than my 24" LCD monitor. The only problem I have with it is when they crop 16x9 shows down to 4x3. I want to see Lost in all its glory.
MacMan86
May 4, 06:24 PM
I saw that - but TBolt has always had two 10-Gbps channels per port.
I'm looking for a statement that says that each port is independent - so that you get 4 channels (two ports with two channels each) with an aggregate throughput of 40 Gbps (each direction).
That's not possible with a PCIe x4 link to the controller as is shown in the Intel diagram. Since the teardown shows only one TBolt controller - either the Intel diagram is incomplete (it doesn't show the possibility of a PCIe x8 connection), or the two Imac TBolt ports share the bandwidth of a PCIe x4 connection and cannot simultaneously run all channels at the rated bandwidth.
This entire Thunderbolt hypefest gives the term "vaporware" a whole new definition.
� but if it's 'per port' then each port has two 10-Gbps channels� I can't see it getting clearer than that.
If the ports weren't independent, it would have to say 'Two 10-Gbps data channels between them' or 'Two 10-Gbps data channels but under full load they're 5-Gbps'
Besides, you are aware that the iMac model in the teardown was the 21.5" with one TB port? There's every possibility that the 27" with two TB ports has two TB controllers. In fact I would say it's more of a likelihood than a possibility
I'm looking for a statement that says that each port is independent - so that you get 4 channels (two ports with two channels each) with an aggregate throughput of 40 Gbps (each direction).
That's not possible with a PCIe x4 link to the controller as is shown in the Intel diagram. Since the teardown shows only one TBolt controller - either the Intel diagram is incomplete (it doesn't show the possibility of a PCIe x8 connection), or the two Imac TBolt ports share the bandwidth of a PCIe x4 connection and cannot simultaneously run all channels at the rated bandwidth.
This entire Thunderbolt hypefest gives the term "vaporware" a whole new definition.
� but if it's 'per port' then each port has two 10-Gbps channels� I can't see it getting clearer than that.
If the ports weren't independent, it would have to say 'Two 10-Gbps data channels between them' or 'Two 10-Gbps data channels but under full load they're 5-Gbps'
Besides, you are aware that the iMac model in the teardown was the 21.5" with one TB port? There's every possibility that the 27" with two TB ports has two TB controllers. In fact I would say it's more of a likelihood than a possibility
chrono1081
Apr 13, 03:48 PM
Who said this was a dumbed down edit suite and no longer for pros?
This looks AMAZING and solves dozens of the gripes that I deal with on a day to day basis.
Thank god that Apple aren't scared of naysayers and traditionalists like user 'Full of Win'!!!
+384082084290384
I've been "video curious" for a long time. At $299 I think its time to bite.
This looks AMAZING and solves dozens of the gripes that I deal with on a day to day basis.
Thank god that Apple aren't scared of naysayers and traditionalists like user 'Full of Win'!!!
+384082084290384
I've been "video curious" for a long time. At $299 I think its time to bite.
sunfast
Oct 20, 06:55 AM
Anti-phishing measures implemented in Safari can only be a good thing and I'm delighted to see them.
And as for the finder - any improvement there is good. Let's hope there's more of this gradual improvement to come.
And as for the finder - any improvement there is good. Let's hope there's more of this gradual improvement to come.
eemsTV
Apr 17, 02:47 AM
My wife and I really enjoy our rooted Droid Xs. My mom wants a Droid X so she agreed to get the I�hone and trade me. I think changing it up and getting the iPh�ne, won't be a bad thing, that way we can have one of each of the best of both OS. I'm glad I don't have to switch to AT&T for it either, never considered a iPho�e till now. Don't know how long before the bionic comes out so I'm willing to be the oddball with the phone all my friends have, in a different color.
Roy Hobbs
Jan 9, 09:12 PM
I have a feeling iLife 07 will be included with Leopard. If they are indeed waiting to ship them together it would really be horrible to wait until say April and then turn around and expect people to buy iLife 08 in 8 months.
My gut feeling is iLife 07 will be a part of Leopard and then back to the normal releases after.
My gut feeling is iLife 07 will be a part of Leopard and then back to the normal releases after.
twoodcc
Sep 2, 05:24 PM
I was able to get 4 console clients running as I put the program in four different folders and ran the -local command and different device IDs. None of them worked as they wouldn't connect or something, can't remember the exact error. I also remember seeing the IP address was blank.
I'll play with it some more tonight when I get home.
There are no GPU clients for PPC right? Thinking my 7800GT could do something useful?
well post the error and we'll try to help.
GPU only works in windows, so you are out of look. but if you decide to build an i7 system, you can get over 30,000 PPD, depending on what all you buy
I'll play with it some more tonight when I get home.
There are no GPU clients for PPC right? Thinking my 7800GT could do something useful?
well post the error and we'll try to help.
GPU only works in windows, so you are out of look. but if you decide to build an i7 system, you can get over 30,000 PPD, depending on what all you buy
Signal-11
Apr 1, 03:30 PM
We're not talking about netbooks. We're talking about G5s and their costs.
Power consumption as a part of total cost of ownership should be considered if cost is a primary concern. As the OP himself admits, he's frugal.
There isn't an analogy more apt than buying an old, cheap gas guzzler. You think you're making out okay, but over the long run, the "cheap" option could be more expensive.
I was being conservative with my estimates - if you live in an electricity-expensive part of the US, price per kWh could be 50-60% more than the 9c I used in my example. If you do anything other than letting he G5 sit idle, you'll consume electricity even more inefficiently. Depending on usage, you could easily hit $200-$250 as the cost of running a dual G5 for a year. A Mini doing the same tasks won't even hit $50. Over two years, the cost will be $300-400 more over a Mini. In three years, $450-$600. There's not cost advantage there anymore. Not only that, in those three years, you'll have been running on an increasingly unsupported platform.
If cost isn't your game, then go to town. But then don't pretend like price is your primary concern when it isn't. I have two unused G5 Power Mac towers that I bought used for mod projects just because I like the case design.
As for expandability, what expandability, specifically? Other than drives, what is a home user going to be doing with any of the expansion slots?
Power consumption as a part of total cost of ownership should be considered if cost is a primary concern. As the OP himself admits, he's frugal.
There isn't an analogy more apt than buying an old, cheap gas guzzler. You think you're making out okay, but over the long run, the "cheap" option could be more expensive.
I was being conservative with my estimates - if you live in an electricity-expensive part of the US, price per kWh could be 50-60% more than the 9c I used in my example. If you do anything other than letting he G5 sit idle, you'll consume electricity even more inefficiently. Depending on usage, you could easily hit $200-$250 as the cost of running a dual G5 for a year. A Mini doing the same tasks won't even hit $50. Over two years, the cost will be $300-400 more over a Mini. In three years, $450-$600. There's not cost advantage there anymore. Not only that, in those three years, you'll have been running on an increasingly unsupported platform.
If cost isn't your game, then go to town. But then don't pretend like price is your primary concern when it isn't. I have two unused G5 Power Mac towers that I bought used for mod projects just because I like the case design.
As for expandability, what expandability, specifically? Other than drives, what is a home user going to be doing with any of the expansion slots?
mcmlxix
Mar 24, 01:59 PM
I must say I was a bit disgruntled when I saw that international orders would ship in 2 to 3 weeks, especially since I got a 4 to 5 week estimate.
Anyway, I just checked my status and it hasn�t budged from April 25th.
Now it says April 21st...which makes it 4 3/7 weeks after I ordered it. That still sounds like 4 to 5 weeks to me.
Anyway, I just checked my status and it hasn�t budged from April 25th.
Now it says April 21st...which makes it 4 3/7 weeks after I ordered it. That still sounds like 4 to 5 weeks to me.
bcaslis
Apr 28, 12:49 PM
...
Laptops have always been a compromise, and thus the choice has always come down to personal preference. Please stop arguing that one is better than the other, because as some of us have been trying to tell you, you'd be wrong.
I have no idea what kind of point you think you are making to this thread. Nobody has ever argued that laptops aren't a compromise. You seemed to argue earlier that some will always hate the 11" (for example no matter how much resolution it will be bad). I made the point that depending on what exactly the tradeoff is (storage versus resolution, etc...) that this will change who wants the 11" and doesn't.
If you are going to argue a point, you should actually have a point to make in mind. I have no idea what you think you are trying to say here. You're trying to say it's personal preference? Of course! Nobody here has ever said there is only one "right" answer.
Laptops have always been a compromise, and thus the choice has always come down to personal preference. Please stop arguing that one is better than the other, because as some of us have been trying to tell you, you'd be wrong.
I have no idea what kind of point you think you are making to this thread. Nobody has ever argued that laptops aren't a compromise. You seemed to argue earlier that some will always hate the 11" (for example no matter how much resolution it will be bad). I made the point that depending on what exactly the tradeoff is (storage versus resolution, etc...) that this will change who wants the 11" and doesn't.
If you are going to argue a point, you should actually have a point to make in mind. I have no idea what you think you are trying to say here. You're trying to say it's personal preference? Of course! Nobody here has ever said there is only one "right" answer.
JRSY37
Mar 7, 11:56 PM
Is that Twitterrific 3 still running, or have you found a way to mod the appearance of Twitterrific 4?
its the version 3.2.4. without a mod.
its the version 3.2.4. without a mod.
nesl247
Apr 6, 11:28 AM
My only complaint is the slowness of Outlook syncing with Exchange 2010. There's at least 20 seconds delay when getting email on my iOS device before Outlook 2011 opens it. Outlook 2010 is instant.
I am not a heavy user of Office products.
This is annoying for me as well. But I believe it's due to the way that Outlook 2011 has to connect. Outlook 2010 uses MAPI whereas Outlook 2011 uses EWS. I'm guessing EWS doesn't support push, or is limited to only checking once a minute.
I am not a heavy user of Office products.
This is annoying for me as well. But I believe it's due to the way that Outlook 2011 has to connect. Outlook 2010 uses MAPI whereas Outlook 2011 uses EWS. I'm guessing EWS doesn't support push, or is limited to only checking once a minute.
jsf8x
Jan 7, 08:28 PM
http://i186.photobucket.com/albums/x159/eliteguard98/Screenshot2011-01-07at91214PM.png
Rodimus Prime
Apr 11, 12:05 AM
Not really a big fan of Carbon Fiber.
Transeau
Nov 13, 11:11 PM
For those wanting to rollback here's the link of Apple's instructions....
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303469
Actually, you can not...
"Note: This CD cannot be used to return an Intel-based Macintosh computer's firmware to a previous version if a successful update has already been performed."
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303469
Actually, you can not...
"Note: This CD cannot be used to return an Intel-based Macintosh computer's firmware to a previous version if a successful update has already been performed."
TallGuy1970
Mar 29, 11:04 AM
Ah yes, the old adage... If you can't beat them, sue them!
quagmire
Apr 29, 10:28 AM
And here I thought Jon was smart and would find out the details of this story before "reporting" it.
Funny segment, disappointed in lack of research.
Funny segment, disappointed in lack of research.
Mattstkc
Mar 24, 11:59 AM
Ha ha ha! Way to prove you arent a Samsung rep..."3 iPad's down", give me a break, nobody could go through 3 iPad 2's with how tight supply has been. Take a hike.
they have replacement and waranty supply at every store that aren't for sale or inventory, only for replacements. If you check a dozen other threads you'll see many people (not just noobs) with this issue who have gotten a couple replacements. I'm too lazy to link you but go look.
they have replacement and waranty supply at every store that aren't for sale or inventory, only for replacements. If you check a dozen other threads you'll see many people (not just noobs) with this issue who have gotten a couple replacements. I'm too lazy to link you but go look.
fpnc
Sep 30, 12:29 AM
It's already possible (for free) to stream video content from the EyeTV over WiFi to the iPhone/iPod touch. All you needed to do is connect to the EyeTV server running on your Mac using Safari on the iPhone/iPod touch. However, you can't control the application remotely and you can't view live TV (only video that you had prerecorded) so the advantage to this new iPhone app is that it enables live TV viewing and control of the EyeTV application running on your Mac.
Now, if it really works over 3G without jailbreaking your iPhone then that would be something new.
Now, if it really works over 3G without jailbreaking your iPhone then that would be something new.
